RI's Fight for Net Neutrality vs. Big Internet Service Providers

GoLocalProv News Team and Kate Nagle

RI's Fight for Net Neutrality vs. Big Internet Service Providers

Pro-net neutrality advocates -- and free market Internet Service Providers (ISPs) -- are on a collision course in RI following new legislation introduced.
The biggest battle at the Rhode Island state house in 2018 might not be the PawSox, minimum wage, or legalized marijuana. It might be supporters of net neutrality -- versus the big internet service providers (ISPs).

"Net neutrality" supporters in Rhode Island introduced legislation on Thursday to allow Rhode Island to "preserve net neutrality as much as possible" following the Federal Communications Commission’s repeal of the open-internet regulation in December.  

The "Rhode Island Net Neutrality Act" would establish criteria for all state contractors and sub-contractors to only purchase internet service from internet service providers (ISPs) that operate under the principles of net neutrality.

GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLAST

"You have to assume [the big ISPs] will be working to try and block it. And yes, I've heard there have been conversations in parts of the building," said State Representative Aaron Regunberg, who was one of the bill sponsors -- and is running for Lt. Governor. "There are specific special interests that want that to be able to infringe on an open and free internet."

On Thursday, Michael Beauregard with the Young Democrats of Rhode Island appeared on GoLocal LIVE to talk about the campaign, following the press conference featuring the legislators as well as the ACLU of Rhode Island, the Rhode Island Library Association, the Information Coalition, and more. 

More below video

For and Against

“It is almost impossible for most of us to imagine getting through the day without using the internet. Open and equal access has been an essential cornerstone of this medium, and the FCC's actions to the contrary amount to a grave threat to online free speech," said Steve Brown with the RI ACLU. "This legislation is an important step in protecting Rhode Islanders from the threats of censorship that the repeal of net neutrality can bring." 

Other groups in Rhode Island, however, including the RI Center for Freedom and Prosperity, have been supportive of the FCC's repeal -- Americans for Tax Reform counted the Center among its coalition against "Obama's FCC Internet Regulations."

“Imposing Title II regulations on Internet Service Providers (ISPs) means the Internet experience will no longer be shaped by consumers — but instead by government.  Rather than being able to respond to what American households want and need in terms of content, advances in technology, information access, and delivery methods, the Internet experience would be determined by regulators who would have control over rates, types of services, and service footprints. Title II also opens the door to new meddling by state and local governments. Congress created the 'information service' classification in Title I precisely to avoid this outcome," wrote the ATF. 

Latest in Fight for Internet Control

State Rep -- and Lt. Governor candidate -- Aaron Regunberg is one of the bill sponsors.
On Thursday, Go Local inquired with ISPs registered to lobby in Rhode Island regarding their position on the legislation introduced. 

The bill would apply "when the state is the purchaser of internet access services, whether for state agencies or for entities to which it provides funding for internet services, such as libraries or any public wi-fi. It would also apply to any agency or organization whose Internet services are provided by state funding, such as grants."

None of the ISPs contacted responded directly to the question of their position on the Rhode Island Net Neutrality Act.

* A PR rep provided a link to AT&T's position statement on the need for an "Internet Bill of Rights."

* For-profit Verizon, when asked, provided a statement from the "non-profit" CTIA -- from July 2017.

* Cox provided a blanket statement about their support for net neutrality -- as well as the FCC's decision to repeal net neutrality. 

"The FCC’s 2017 vote to remove the Title II section of the Net Neutrality rules does not impact our commitment to Net Neutrality. We do not block, throttle or otherwise interfere with consumers’ desire to go where they want on the Internet. Cox has always been committed to providing an open Internet experience for our customers, and reversing the classification of Internet services does not change our commitment. Reestablishing a ‘light-touch’ approach by overturning Title II, the 1930s-era utility telephone regulations, returns a level of certainty for consumer protections and future investment and innovation that spur the growth of the Internet," said Cox in a statement. 

"I think that response is pretty indicative of what we've heard from [ISPs], where they say they don't need special net neutrality protections because they'd never do anything against it," said Regunberg. 'But you can say that about any rule or law. It's like someone saying they should be able to trust their 6-year-old to take one piece of candy. But it opens up [ISPs'] ability for more control and more profits and ability to restrict competition -- and major corporations like these don't have a great track record when the cookie jar is open."

"Remember, the majority of voices that were speaking to the FCC process in favor were trolls and bots and fraud voices," said Regunberg, referring to a Pew research study that found the use on both sides of the issue.  "I think the easier answer is if you support an open internet, you should support this legislation."

As GoLocal reported in December:

U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) has taken tens of thousands in campaign donations this year from top executives from Comcast -- one of the corporations who helped lead the fight to repeal "net neutrality." In addition, he has taken tens of thousands from the Comcast PAC and employees over the past eight years -- a total of approximately $60,000.


17 Biggest Business Stories of 2017

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.