Riley: Does the RI Treasurer Know his Senior Policy Adviser?
Michael G. Riley, GoLocalProv MINDSETTER™
Riley: Does the RI Treasurer Know his Senior Policy Adviser?

Governor Raimondo clearly saw the danger in the State plan but wouldn’t even address Providence. Ironically the State was in an infinitely better position than our State Capital of Providence is in today. In 2011 Rhode Island was roughly 48%. Immediately after reforms it was stated at 58%. Today ,4 years later after a massive bull market in both bonds and stocks, and the groundbreaking reform that included amortization the state funding ratio is still 58% or less. Zero improvement. Providence is 26% funded and heading lower. This is frightening and the combination of an inexperienced Treasurer and a leftist Policy director should be enough to convince Moody’s that there is a real problem afoot. Undoubtedly Sgouros will recommend even further amortization since his public statement show he clearly does not believe in “generational equity." Sorry youngsters, but Tom Sgouros and his ilk don’t care about your economic burden. Article after article point to the willingness of Sgouros to mislead bond investors and the choice of Sgouros by Mgaziner shows that a similar cynicism is held by the new Treasurer.
Consider these two views
GET THE LATEST BREAKING NEWS HERE -- SIGN UP FOR GOLOCAL FREE DAILY EBLASTJoe Newton of Gabriel Roeder Smith & Co: Raimondos actuary 2011
“There are only three levers you can pull,” Newton said. In order to close the gap between its current assets and its commitments to pensioners, the state could increase taxpayer contributions to the pension system, reduce the cost of the benefits the system pays out or increase the system’s investment earnings — a tall order in volatile economic times. Continuing without reform would lead to decreased benefits, salaries and services, as pension contributions drain resources from other areas of the state budget, he said.
Tom Sgouros Quote
October 2011
“I wrote a few weeks ago about how the biggest problem our state pension plan faces is in the accounting rules we follow. These accounting rules were designed for private companies, to help protect pension funds from the risk that the employer who set up the fund would go out of business. The state won't cease to exist, so protecting against that risk is pointless -- and expensive. But there is a flip side to this point: there certainly are risks that a public pension plan suffers from. I don't know a way to say whether they're greater in the public over the private sector, but do the accounting rules we use protect us against those risks?”
Further quotes from this policy director can be found in his scary “The Manufactured OPEB Crisis.” Can you imagine a guy who never managed money being elected Treasurer of Rhode Island in the midst of a pension Crisis and selecting an anti-capitalist political supporter who doesn’t believe basic financial concepts as his policy adviser? Sadly, you don’t have to imagine this scenario because you are living it.

